Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: likihood function is not concave in clogit model
From
Maarten Buis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: likihood function is not concave in clogit model
Date
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:32:34 +0200
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Nina YIN wrote:
> I have a purchasing data with more than 10000 observations over 20
> products in 14 years. I am going to estimate the demand in conditional
> fixed logit model. To solve the endogeneity problem, I need to add
> product-year fixed effects. which implies 170 fixed effects should be
> included in the clogit estimation. The results turn out that estimates
> couldn't be achieved like this:
> If I simply use products fixed effects, the convergence could be
> achieved and estimates will return. I just don't get what's the
> problem in my model, several references could achieve convergence even
> with much higher dimension of fixed effects. But why I couldn't? Is it
> because of the data variation or my model specification?
By estimating a fixed effects model you throw away a lot of
information, so it can easily happen that even with 10000 observations
there just isn't enough information present in your data to estimate
the effects of a 169 indicator variables. What about adding indicator
variables for product and year but not their interaction? That way you
would end up with a more manageable set of 32 indicator variables.
-- Maarten
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/