Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Christopher Baum <kit.baum@bc.edu> |
To | "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | Re: st: Statistical tests under heteroskedasticity |
Date | Tue, 15 May 2012 09:15:30 -0400 |
<> On May 15, 2012, at 2:33 AM, Lukas wrote: > I use Stata 11.2 and I want to run several statistical tests to analyse my regression results. In my regression, I use the -robust- option but now I became aware, that heteroskedasticity invalidates my statistical tests such as hypothesis tests as well. > > Is there a way to run the -ttest- and -testparm- commands under heteroskedasticity without invalidating their results? Calculating robust standard errors -- or more properly, a robust VCE -- 'robustifies' all computations done with that VCE, including t-tests and F-tests. So if the only departure from i.i.d. errors is heteroskedasticity, the 'robust' option makes all subsequent test, testparm, lincom, etc. valid. Kit Kit Baum | Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin | http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html An Introduction to Stata Programming | http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata | http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/