Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Statistical tests under heteroskedasticity
From
"Airey, David C" <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: Statistical tests under heteroskedasticity
Date
Mon, 14 May 2012 15:47:44 -0500
.
Thanks. I should have said approximately normal distributions of the parameter estimates.
-Dave
> Dave,
>
> What's the part about normally distributed coefficients? In the usual
> linear regression models, the coefficients are assumed to be
> constants.
>
> If the departure from constant variance (of the errors) is systematic,
> it may point to a need for a transformation of the dependent variable.
>
> David Hoaglin
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Airey, David C
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > .
> >
> > I was just reviewing assumptions for linear regression (simple error structure).
> >
> > independence -- needed for all types of inference
> > normally distributed coefficients -- needed for all types of inference
> > constant variance -- needed for all types of inference; can be relaxed by robust standard errors
> > correct mean model -- needed for group comparison and prediction
> > normal residuals -- needed for prediction; not fixed by robust standard errors
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/