Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: missing values
From
Chiara Mussida <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: missing values
Date
Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:54:48 +0200
the missing details for the paper are: industrial and labor relations,
volume 49, issue 2.
The difference between the log wages of men and women does not equal
the sum of the wage gap in each occupation. May this be due to missing
values in the ingredients used in the decomposition?
Thanks a lot
On 02/04/2012, Maarten Buis <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Chiara Mussida wrote:
>> i want to calculate the decomposition(eq 3) in the paper of Kidd and
>> Shannon, 1996,does the level of occupational aggregation affect the
>> estimates of the gender wage gap?
>
> You have been on the list long enough, so you really should know
> better. As penance read the Statalist FAQ three times!
>
> -- Maarten
>
> --------------------------
> Maarten L. Buis
> Institut fuer Soziologie
> Universitaet Tuebingen
> Wilhelmstrasse 36
> 72074 Tuebingen
> Germany
>
>
> http://www.maartenbuis.nl
> --------------------------
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
--
Chiara Mussida
PhD candidate
Doctoral school of Economic Policy
Catholic University, Piacenza (Italy)
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/