Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Challenging problem.
From
"Victor Zammit" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: Challenging problem.
Date
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:23:27 +0100
Dear Stata Users,
The following is a table,representing the results five counts in a local
election with 1352 valid ballots.
The electing quota for a candidate was 320.Candidate #3,can_3,is elected in
the first count,c1,
with first preference.The extra votes,721-320 = 401,get distributed
proportionately to
the candidates that receive second preference,after can_1's (first
preference) votes.
can c1 c2 c3 c4 c5
can_1 295 423 423 320 320
can_2 20 39 58 90 0
can_3 721 320 320 320 320
can_4 253 442 320 320 320
can_5 63 102 203 270 356
n-t.v. 0 26 28 32 36
total 1352 1352 1352 1352 1352
Subtracting c1 from c2, gives the proportinate amounts that were distributed
to the other
candidates and the proportionate amount of the non-transferable
votes,n-t.v.,from which,can be
derived the second prefernce that each candidate and non transferables
,receive.
pref_2 = [[ c2-c1]/401] * 721, format pref_2 %3.0f .
can c1 c2 p_dist pref_2
can_1 295 423 128 230
can_2 20 39 19 34
can_3 721 320 0 0
can_4 253 442 189 340
can_5 63 102 39 70
n-t.v. 0 26 26 47
The extra over 320 for can_4 and after that,can_1,are dealt with
similarly.In the fourth count,
the accumulation of 90 votes for can_2,are distributed directly on can_5 and
n-t.v. .
Given this information,is it possible to simulate the 1352 ballots?.I
appreciate any feedback..
Victor Zammit
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/