Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: Hessian trigger "too many literals" error with "ml model"
From
<[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: Hessian trigger "too many literals" error with "ml model"
Date
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:33:10 -0500
Hello all,
I work with STATA 11, 64 bit.
I am estimating a discrete labour supply model for single individuals. My model is similar to what is done in many economic paper on this topic.
When I use a quadratic utility function including fixed cost for working such that:
U = beta_y * income + beta_h * hours + alpha_ysq * income square + alpha_hsq * hours square + alpha_yh * (hours times income)
y = Y - gamma_fcw * dummy_if_working - gamma_fcwft * dummy_if_working_40_hours_per_week
Where y = income, h = hours, ysq = income square, hsq = hours square and yh = interaction between hours and income and where Y represent income net of taxes.
Ml model works perfectly with d0, d1 and d2 approach (d2 being much faster and stable).
When I relax the independence of irrelevant alternative of my extreme value distribution by using simulated maximum likelihood approach to include a random term with income for example (I am using Halton generated numbers), d2 stop working as I get a "too many literals" with my Hessian, but d0 and d1 provides me with similar results.
If I omit fixed cost of working variables, d2 works.
Is there a way to increase the number of "literals" as d2 is much faster?
Cheers,
Jean-François
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/