Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: tabulate produces inconsistent output?
From
Christian Raschke <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: tabulate produces inconsistent output?
Date
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:07:01 -0600
Any other opinions?
The only suggestion so far is that I update my Stata. But I am fully
updated and there are no further updates available, so that is not the
problem.
I am very concerned because there are no errors or any other problems
whatsoever that would indicate a faulty installation or the like. There
are no red flags, only clearly incorrect output.
Christian
On 11/19/2011 1:42 PM, Christian Raschke wrote:
Hello Stata-listers,
I am running into the following very odd problem: I have a factor
variable that I would like to -tabulate-, but every time I use -tab-,
I get different results. When running -tab- back to back on the same
variable in the same data set I get entirely different results every
time.
All the years that I have used Stata, I've never had anything like
this happen, so I am totally stumped. There are only 2 variables in my
data set: a variable "ID" that is storage type double and the variable
"pldel" that is storage type byte.
Please see what I copied and pasted at the end of this email straight
from my interactive session. The same oddity occurs if I use the -tab
pldel, gen()- syntax; in that same session I continue to get different
results every time I run a simple tab, so the below are just two
arbitrary examples.
If I open a new clean session of Stata, then tab works as expected. I
did not define any user defined programs or do anything anything else
of that nature in the broken session. The only commands in my Command
History are various versions of -use-, -tab-, -count-, -describe-, and
-browse-.
So, what might have happened to break a basic command like -tab-? I
know that using a new session fixes the immediate problem at hand, but
I want to ensure that something like this does not happen in any of my
data analyses in the future!
If it matters, I'm running Stata 12.0 SE 64-bit on a Windows 7 machine.
I apologize if this has been discussed before, but a quick preliminary
search turned up nothing. I would appreciate any help troubleshooting.
. tab pldel
Place of |
Delivery | Freq. Percent Cum.
------------+-----------------------------------
1 | 223,057 98.96 98.96
2 | 2,191 0.97 99.93
3 | 106 0.05 99.98
9 | 46 0.02 100.00
------------+-----------------------------------
Total | 225,400 100.00
r; t=0.08 13:15:07
. tab pldel
Place of |
Delivery | Freq. Percent Cum.
------------+-----------------------------------
1 | 62,726 99.41 99.41
2 | 351 0.56 99.96
9 | 23 0.04 100.00
------------+-----------------------------------
Total | 63,100 100.00
r; t=0.08 13:15:11
. count
3765064
r; t=0.02 13:15:14
Best regards,
Christian Raschke
PhD Candidate, Department of Economics
Louisiana State University
[email protected]
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/