Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: Quantum mechanics in Stata
From
"Feiveson, Alan H. (JSC-SK311)" <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: Quantum mechanics in Stata
Date
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:25:25 -0600
Stas - I remember now, that this particular issue contained some pretty neat stuff - like how to make contrived data sets whose residual plots after regression make pretty pictures.
Al
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stas Kolenikov
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 2:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: Quantum mechanics in Stata
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Feiveson, Alan H. (JSC-SK311)
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Stas - There is an article by Jesse Frey in the American Statistician May, 2007 "Is an .833 Hitter Better Than a .338 Hitter?" that elaborates on your baseball example.
Um... it is rather the other way around: I reproduced the example
because it stuck in my head, but for the life of me, I would not
remember where I would have read about it! Thanks for the cite, Al!
--
Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name
Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/