Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | "Feiveson, Alan H. (JSC-SK311)" <alan.h.feiveson@nasa.gov> |
| To | "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
| Subject | RE: st: Quantum mechanics in Stata |
| Date | Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:25:25 -0600 |
Stas - I remember now, that this particular issue contained some pretty neat stuff - like how to make contrived data sets whose residual plots after regression make pretty pictures. Al -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Stas Kolenikov Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 2:49 PM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: Re: st: Quantum mechanics in Stata On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Feiveson, Alan H. (JSC-SK311) <alan.h.feiveson@nasa.gov> wrote: > Stas - There is an article by Jesse Frey in the American Statistician May, 2007 "Is an .833 Hitter Better Than a .338 Hitter?" that elaborates on your baseball example. Um... it is rather the other way around: I reproduced the example because it stuck in my head, but for the life of me, I would not remember where I would have read about it! Thanks for the cite, Al! -- Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/