Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: model specification
From
Jet <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: model specification
Date
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:38:13 -0500
Thanks, Cam. Did you ever see any similar issues with some empirical
research? Would you mind giving some examples?
How about opinions from others on this listserv?
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Cameron McIntosh <[email protected]> wrote:
> Endogeneity or a tautology? :) I would only use predictors not used to compute the outcome. Cam
>
>> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:24:27 -0500
>> Subject: st: model specification
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]
>>
>> Hello, we have a model specification question and would appreciate any
>> suggestions. If the outcome measures the college graduates' debt
>> burden (ratio of monthly loan payment to monthly income), and we'd
>> like to see what factors predict their debt burden a couple of years
>> after graduation. Does it make sense to include financial aid
>> variables (grants, merit aid, loans they received during undergrad) as
>> predictors, given that they are a part of the outcome? Would it raise
>> any endogeneity issue?
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/