Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: nlsur time series varlist
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: nlsur time series varlist
Date
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 11:19:12 +0000
You just have to create the variables yourself beforehand. Whether -nlsur- fits what you want to do otherwise is for others to comment on. Presumably this will bite with l. as well as d.
Nick
[email protected]
[email protected]
I want to use 'nlsur' to estimate a system of equation of this type:
(d.var1= {a0} + {b1}*d.var2+{b2}*(d.log(var3+{a1}*(var4)^{a2})) + {ecm}*(l.var5-{a3}+{a4}*log(l.var6+{a1}*(var7)^{a2})))
(d.var8= {a0} + {b1}*d.var2+{b2}*(d.log(var3+{a1}*(var4)^{a2})) + {ecm}*(l.var5-{a3}+{a4}*log(l.var6+{a1}*(var7)^{a2})))
etc.
However, stata does not accept the operator 'd.' used in the expression d.log(var3+{a1}*(var4)^{a2}).
Is there any way to circumvent this problem?
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/