Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: xthtaylor by hand or using xtivreg2
From
"Schaffer, Mark E" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: xthtaylor by hand or using xtivreg2
Date
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:41:46 -0000
Marc,
I found the source of your first problem: the undocumented -noisily-
option of -xtoverid- was using another option that was incompatible with
displaying first-stage results.
I'll fix it and let you and the rest of the list know when the update is
available.
Cheers,
Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of M.M. Kramer
> Sent: 02 November 2011 15:06
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: st: xthtaylor by hand or using xtivreg2
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> After xtoverid, noisily (I cannot find xtoverid2) I receive
> the following errors:
> 1. Unable to display summary of first-stage estimates; macro
> e(first) is missing 2. xtoverid error: internal reestimation
> of eqn differs from original
>
> And sometimes also:
> Warning - endogenous variable(s) collinear with instruments
> *: 3200 conformability error
> s_egmm(): - function returned error
> <istmt>: - function returned error
>
> Thanks for your help.
> Marc
>
>
> Schaffer, Mark E wrote:
> > Marc,
> >
> > What is the problem you encounter when using xtoverid or xtoverid2
> > with the noisily option? Is it that the full first-stage results
> > aren't displayed? I was looking at the code and it seems that this
> > undocumented option should - but doesn't - trigger display of the
> > first-stage results.
> >
> > --Mark
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of M.M.
> >> Kramer
> >> Sent: 02 November 2011 09:26
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: st: xthtaylor by hand or using xtivreg2
> >>
> >> Dear Nick,
> >>
> >> I am trying to estimate the impact of a self-choosen treatment on
> >> portfolio returns of retail investors. This self-choosen
> treatment is
> >> very likely endogenous, it does not vary over time and we
> do not have
> >> external instuments available, so Hausman-Taylor might be an
> >> appropriate estimation technique. The problem that I keep
> >> encountering is that I cannot assess the quality of the
> instruments
> >> that xthtaylor creates. I cannot see the first stage results when
> >> using xtoverid2 and I receive warnings on collinearity. My
> idea was
> >> to create the instruments by hand and then use 2SLS to see what's
> >> going on. So far, I found that xthtaylor transforms the
> timevarying
> >> exogenous variables into means, and demeaned variables and
> uses some
> >> other transformations.
> >> My question therefore is how exactly to replicate the variable
> >> transformation of xthaylor to create the instruments by hand.
> >>
> >> Marc
> >>
> >> Nick Cox wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Many people will sympathise to some degree here, but what
> >>>
> >> kind of help
> >>
> >>> are you expecting _which can reasonably be provided_?
> >>>
> >>> 1. To comment helpfully on your difficulties with
> >>>
> >> -xthtaylor- people
> >>
> >>> will surely want more detail on your problems.
> >>>
> >>> 2. If you seek to use -xtivreg2- (SSC), the same comment applies
> >>> there: the help is the place to start and people will want to see
> >>> specific queries.
> >>>
> >>> 3. -xthtaylor- is some hundreds of lines long, so
> >>>
> >> reproducing it "by
> >>
> >>> hand" is not trivial.
> >>>
> >>> Nick
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:26 AM, M.M. Kramer
> >>>
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> I have been struggling for some time with the xthtaylor command.
> >>>> Especially the various error messages that occur after
> >>>>
> >> some tests are hard to solve.
> >>
> >>>> Does anyone have any clear instructions on how to transform the
> >>>> variables in a way that xtivreg2 can be used? Or may be
> >>>>
> >> anyone has
> >>
> >>>> the syntax to replicate the output of xthtaylor by hand.
> >>>> Thanks.
> >>>> Marc Kramer
> >>>> *
> >>>> * For searches and help try:
> >>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> >>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> >>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> *
> >>> * For searches and help try:
> >>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> >>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> >>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Marc Kramer
> >> University of Groningen
> >> Faculty of Economics & Business
> >> Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance Room WSN
> 860 P.O.
> >> Box 800 9700 AV Groningen
> >> Tel.: 050-363.4532 / 3685
> >>
> >> *
> >> * For searches and help try:
> >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> >> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Marc Kramer
> University of Groningen
> Faculty of Economics & Business
> Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance Room WSN
> 860 P.O. Box 800 9700 AV Groningen
> Tel.: 050-363.4532 / 3685
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
--
Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity
registered under charity number SC000278.
Heriot-Watt University is the Sunday Times
Scottish University of the Year 2011-2012
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/