Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: arega and post regression tests
From
Ozgur Ozdemir <[email protected]>
To
Stata <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: arega and post regression tests
Date
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 12:58:49 +0000
hi,
i think it is available on Stata 11 - I have only 10.
kind regards
Ozgur Ozdemir
T: +44 (0) 75 0332 9865
E: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Skype : ozgurozdemir2005
----------------------------------------
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 12:45:42 +0000
> Subject: RE: st: arega and post regression tests
>
> No; you don't need to do that as you can use factor variable notation.
>
> Nick
> [email protected]
>
> Ozgur Ozdemir
>
> Hi Kit,
> my industry codes are one on single column, do you mean that I need to create one dummy variable for each industry code first and then I can use normal regression ?
>
> > From: [email protected]
>
> > I have been requested to use areg in my regression due to large dummy variable (15 industry codes in a sample of 1100 firms) set...
> >
> > The requestor is being silly. What's wrong with having 15 additional coefficients in a sample of 1100? The areg command is estimating those same coefficients; it is just not displaying them.
> >
> > Using a table-producing routine such as built-in -estimates table-, you can produce output not showing the dummy coefficients with drop() or keep(). Same goes for user-written routines like Ben Jann's -estout- on SSC. Use -regress- and show the requestor the edited output.
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/