Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Degrees of Freedom, F-test and Multiple Imputation
From
Andrea Bennett <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: Degrees of Freedom, F-test and Multiple Imputation
Date
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:40:30 +0100
Hi!
I am slightly confused with the degrees of freedom
in regressions based on imputed data (M=20).
Let's say I have 50 school classes nested in 30 schools.
Assume a regression that is based on a single imputed
data set (e.g. m=5) and clustered on the class-level.
Now, adding fixed effects for schools shows that the
F-test has not enough degrees of freedom to be calculated.
However, running the same regression with the full set of
imputed data (m=0, …, m=20) is - according to Stata -
no problem since the degrees of freedom are calculated
over the full range of all imputed observations.
My question: Can I belief these Stata calculations? I don't
quite understand why I should have more degrees of
freedom and whether I can make use of it, i.e. would it
be statistically ok to include fixed effects in the above
case when working with the complete set of
imputed data (m=0, …, m=20) since Stata reports
the F-test just fine?
Your suggestions are very welcomed!
Andrea
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/