Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: Obtaining random intercept for each group from xtlogit or xtmelogit
From
Orian Brook <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: Obtaining random intercept for each group from xtlogit or xtmelogit
Date
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:26:21 +0100
Brilliant, thank you
I was expecting the intercepts to be common across countries - however, some
have standard deviations (tiny, but still). Am I misunderstanding?
Summary of random effects for
NATION COUNTRY: _cons
(SAMPLE) Mean Std. Dev. Freq.
BELGIUM .08866321 . 1040
DENMARK .85474342 1.179e-07 1008
GERMANY W .44680032 . 1006
GERMANY E .66576046 . 528
GREECE -.70365345 . 1000
SPAIN .0415894 . 1006
FINLAND .69681209 . 1040
FRANCE -.02973256 . 1031
IRELAND .19429855 1.667e-08 1000
ITALY -.05471432 . 1000
LUXEMBOUR .94192523 9.375e-08 500
NETHERLAN 1.0726261 0 1000
AUSTRIA .14302817 . 1011
PORTUGAL -.53366905 . 1013
SWEDEN 1.2025346 . 1011
GREAT BRI .64745915 . 1009
NORTHERN .32294551 . 301
CYPRUS (R -.52049023 . 500
CZECH REP .73380858 . 1060
ESTONIA .51977873 0 1001
HUNGARY .11004449 . 1000
LATVIA .6622172 . 1006
LITUANIA .10387274 1.520e-08 1029
MALTA .13686518 . 500
POLAND -.42845824 . 1000
SLOVAKIA .4025459 . 1094
SLOVENIA .4127627 . 1015
BULGARIA -.67533928 . 1009
ROMANIA -.59633559 7.265e-08 1028
CROATIA -6.7901573 0 1000
Total -.02248435 1.4072492 27746
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Phil Clayton
Sent: 20 July 2011 14:57
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: Obtaining random intercept for each group from xtlogit or
xtmelogit
After xtmelogit try:
predict rintercept, reffects
Phil
On 20/07/2011, at 11:10 PM, Orian Brook wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I'm have data on a binary outcome which is organised as respondents
> within countries. What I really want to know is the random intercept
> for each country, but I can't see how to get it - could anyone point
> me? (I was previously not using a multilevel approach and had a dummy
> variable for each country, to get the country effect - but I realised
> I really should try a multilevel approach).
>
> The syntax I'm using is
>
> xi:xtmelogit QA4_PERF VD8 i.D10 VD11 i.C14 i.QB3 i.D25 || COUNTRY:
> xi:xtlogit QA4_PERF VD8 i.D10 VD11 i.C14 i.QB3 i.D25, i(COUNTRY)
>
> They get the same log-likelihood results, though naturally xtmelogit
> takes longer to run, I realise it has other options available.
> Thanks for any advice.
>
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/