Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: interpretation of beta and hazard ratio
From
"Yusvita Triwiadhian S." <[email protected]>
To
statalist <[email protected]>
Subject
st: interpretation of beta and hazard ratio
Date
Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:58:06 +0700
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Yusvita Triwiadhian S. <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 8:27 PM
Subject: st: interpretation of beta and hazard ratio
To: statalist <[email protected]>
Dear all,
i'm using gompertz regression gamma frailty. . the result is :
betha (X1)= 1,94486 and hazard ratio is 6,99264
X1 is binary indicator of smoking status. event is death.
How to interpret it?
it means that cigarette smokers die at 6,99264 the rate of
comparable non-smoker and cigarette smokers will die 1,94486 days
sooner than non-smoker . is it correct?
thank you.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/