Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Predicted probability after xtlogit with i option
From
Joerg Luedicke <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Predicted probability after xtlogit with i option
Date
Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:59:04 -0400
I am not 100% sure if its doable with -xtlogit-, but you could use -xtmelogit-
for which the default prediction (-mu-) takes the random effect into account
(see -help xtmelogit postestimation-). (Using the option -fixedonly- with
-predict- after -xtmelogit- should replicate your predictions from -xtlogit-).
J.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Urmi Bhattacharya <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Statalisters,
>
> I am running the following xtlogit model
>
> xtlogit school_left childage i.childfemale i.urban i.scstobc
> i.casteother i.dadp i.dadm i.momp i.momm wagep wage5 wage8 wage9 distp
> distm disth percapcons durat1 durat2 durat3 durat4 durat5 durat6
> durat7 durat8 durat9 durat10 durat11, nocons nolog i(childcaseid)
>
> After estimation, I need to find the predicted probability for each individual.
>
> I do the following:
>
> predict prob,pu0
>
> The help file says that this calculation assumes that the random
> effect is 0. My question is if it would be possible to find the
> predicated probability not assuming that? Or is this the best I can
> do.
>
> Thanks
>
> Urmi Bhattacharya
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/