Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Fixed effects panel in presence of heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation
From
Volker Ludwig <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Fixed effects panel in presence of heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation
Date
Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:02:52 +0200
Hi Natalie,
xtreg ... , fe vce(robust) and xtreg ... , fe vce(cluster idvar) give
identical results.
The s.e. are robust against both heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation.
Stock / Watson (2008, Econometrica) propose alternatives that give more
efficient s.e. in case there is no serial correlation or the correlation
can be modelled by a moving average.
Best
Volker
Am 21.06.2011 17:13, schrieb Natalie Trapp:
Dear Statalist,
I would like to estimate a panel model in presence of
heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation with individual effects.
However, I am unsure whether the estimator "xtreg..., fe vce(cluster
panelvar)" is consistent in presence of heteroscedasticity and
autocorrelation? In Cameron and Trivedi (2005, p. 335) I found that
"xtscc" could give consistent estimates of the VCE.
I would appreciate any help!
Best regards,
Natalie
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
--
________________________
Volker Ludwig
Universität Mannheim
Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung (MZES)
D-68131 Mannheim
phone +49-621-181-2849
fax +49-621-181-2803
[email protected]
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/