Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Ridhima Gupta <g.ridhima@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: encountering problem with esttab while attempting to get summary statistics into latex |
Date | Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:59:47 +0100 |
Hello Maarten, It worked with this new version. I should have run the programme before mailing you. Can't thank you enough. Many many thanks, Ridhima On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Ridhima Gupta <g.ridhima@gmail.com> wrote: > Maarten I fixed that. > > The estout ado file reads. > > *! version 3.13 06aug2009 Ben Jann > > program define estout, rclass > version 8.2 > > Which version are you using? > > I got this one from SSC. > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Ridhima Gupta <g.ridhima@gmail.com> wrote: >> Marteen something strange is happening. I tried to unistall estout >> using the command >> >> ado uninstall estout, from ("/users/ridhima/Library/Application >> Support/Stata/ado/stbplus") >> >> Stata then showed that: >> >> package estout from http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/bocode/e >> 'ESTOUT': module to make regression tables >> >> (package uninstalled) >> >> >> Now I tried to install it again using >> >> ssc install estout >> >> Now I get a message saying: >> >> the following files already exist and are different: >> /users/ridhima/Library/Application Support/Stata/ado/stbplus/_/_eststo.ado >> /users/ridhima/Library/Application Support/Stata/ado/stbplus/e/estadd.ado >> /users/ridhima/Library/Application Support/Stata/ado/stbplus/e/estadd.hlp >> /users/ridhima/Library/Application Support/Stata/ado/stbplus/e/estout.ado >> /users/ridhima/Library/Application Support/Stata/ado/stbplus/e/estout.hlp >> /users/ridhima/Library/Application Support/Stata/ado/stbplus/e/eststo.ado >> /users/ridhima/Library/Application Support/Stata/ado/stbplus/e/eststo.hlp >> /users/ridhima/Library/Application Support/Stata/ado/stbplus/e/esttab.ado >> /users/ridhima/Library/Application Support/Stata/ado/stbplus/e/esttab.hlp >> >> no files installed or copied >> (no action taken) >> r(602); >> >> >> When I try to unistall it again using the same command as above, it read >> >> ado uninstall estout, from ("/users/ridhima/Library/Application >> Support/Stata/ado/stbplus") >> >> package not found >> r(111); >> >> >> What am I doing wrong here? >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Ridhima Gupta wrote: >>>> Maarten I followed this example as it was more pertinent. See the >>>> second example. >>> >>> The following adaptation of that example runs without problem in my >>> version of Stata. >>> >>> *---------------------------- begin example -------------------------- >>> cd c:/temp >>> sysuse auto, clear >>> eststo clear >>> bysort foreign: gen total = _N >>> label var total "Observations" >>> >>> estpost tabstat price gear_ratio total, by(foreign) /// >>> listwise s(mean sd) columns(statistics) >>> esttab using foo.tex, /// >>> main(mean) aux(sd) /// >>> nostar nodepvar unstack nomtitle nonumber noobs label /// >>> addnotes("Note: Mean with standard deviation in parentheses.") /// >>> title("Summary \label{tab:sum}") /// >>> replace nonotes >>> *------------------------------- end example ------------------------------ >>> (For more on examples I sent to the Statalist see: >>> http://www.maartenbuis.nl/example_faq ) >>> >>> Which version of -estout- are you running? A common problem occurs >>> when people install the version of some user written command from the >>> Stata Journal when there is a newer version available from SSC. The >>> main strength of the Stata Journal archive is that it makes the >>> results of articles in the Stata Journal reproducible, but it is >>> relatively slow as it is linked to the appearance schedule of the >>> journal. SSC is much quicker, but/because it is not linked to the >>> Stata Journal. This leads to different versions being available on the >>> Stata Journal archive and the SSC. It is up to you to choose the >>> latest one which is typically but not always the one on SSC. This is >>> why the Statalist FAQ askes you to specify where you got your user >>> written commands from. If we are talking about different versions, >>> than it is unlikely that we can solve your problem. >>> >>> Hope this helps, >>> Maarten >>> >>> -------------------------- >>> Maarten L. Buis >>> Institut fuer Soziologie >>> Universitaet Tuebingen >>> Wilhelmstrasse 36 >>> 72074 Tuebingen >>> Germany >>> >>> >>> http://www.maartenbuis.nl >>> -------------------------- >>> * >>> * For searches and help try: >>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq >>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ >>> >> > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/