Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: First stage F stats - xtivreg
From
Austin Nichols <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: First stage F stats - xtivreg
Date
Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:39:00 -0400
Agnese Romiti <[email protected]>:
Are you clustering by region to account for the likely correlation of
errors within region?
Also see
http://www.stata.com/meeting/boston10/boston10_nichols.pdf
for an alternative model that allows your dep var to be nonnegative.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Agnese Romiti <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Statalist users,
>
> I'm running a fixed effect model with IV (xtivreg2) , my dependent
> variable is a measure of labor supply at the individual level (working
> hours). Whereas I have an endogenous variable with variation only at
> regional-year level.
> My question is about the First stage statistics, the Weak
> identification test results in an F statistics extremely high which
> makes me worry about something wrong, i.e. F=3289.
> Do you have any clue about potential reasons driving this odd result?
>
> Many thanks in advance for your help.
>
> Agnese
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/