Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: Modelling extremely rare events (binary)
From
DE SOUZA Eric <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: Modelling extremely rare events (binary)
Date
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:47:43 +0200
If I'm not mistaken, Gary King is a Bayesian, which explains the title.
Best wishes,
Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Markus Eberhardt
Sent: 14 June 2011 11:43
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: Modelling extremely rare events (binary)
Eric, I am 'harvesting' the site as we speak. I like the title of one of his papers, "Estimating the Probability of Events that Have Never Occurred".
Best wishes
m
Markus Eberhardt
ESRC Post-doctoral Research Fellow, Centre for the Study of African Economies, Department of Economics, University of Oxford Stipendiary Lecturer, St Catherine's College, Oxford
web: http://sites.google.com/site/medevecon/home
email: [email protected]
twitter: http://twitter.com/sjoh2052
mail: Centre for the Study of African Economies, Department of Economics, Manor Rd, Oxford OX1 3UQ, England
On 14 June 2011 10:37, DE SOUZA Eric <[email protected]> wrote:
> He has a whole page devoted to it:
> http://gking.harvard.edu/category/research-interests/methods/rare-even
> ts
>
>
> Eric de Souza
> College of Europe
> Brugge (Bruges), Belgium
> http://www.coleurope.eu
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Abhimanyu
> Arora
> Sent: 14 June 2011 11:29
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: st: Modelling extremely rare events (binary)
>
> Hi
> Perhaps you could have a look at Gary Kings's -relogit-?
> Best
> Abhimanyu
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Markus Eberhardt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hello everybody
>>
>> I have an empirical problem where for a very large dataset (panel,
>> around 20,000 panel members with over 60,000 observations) I have two
>> binary outcome variables A and B. The occurrence of either is
>> extremely rare: only about 1.5% and 0.1% of observations for A and B
>> respectively. I am for the time being treating this as a pooled
>> panel, so not accounting for any fixed effects at the panel member
>> level. My empirical model is made up of continuous and binary
>> variables. In the logit and probit I am estimating A and B
>> separately, for biprobit jointly, for mlogit I have four categories
>> (0, A occurrs, B occurrs, both occurr). Ideally the analysis does
>> account for the jointess of the decision as in the biprobit and mlogit approaches.
>>
>> Here are my questions:
>> (1) DOES THIS AT ALL MAKE SENSE? Having estimated logit, probit,
>> bivariate probit and multinomial logit I am concerned about the
>> viability of what I am doing to this data: given the minute share of
>> actual events occurring (1s, rather than 0s) is it at all possible
>> that a logit-type model could tell me anything meaningful? So far I
>> am getting interpretable empirical results, but it was put to me that
>> these were entirely unreliable (or even spurious) given the extreme
>> rarety of the event. Note that there are strong priors (from the
>> descriptive analysis) that a certain characteristic (binary) drives
>> the outcomes, so I imagine that a fixed effect and/or an interaction
>> of this binary characteristic with other (continuous) RHS variables
>> may provide an intuitive 'fit', but I am unsure whether this is
>> empirically satisfied.
>> (2) USEFUL DIAGNOSTICS? My diagnostics for the model(s) are hampered
>> by the fact that it's difficult to get a handle on what constitutes a
>> substantial deviation for the predicted from the observed outcomes.
>> Apart from -fitstat- type diagnostics, are there any other things I
>> could do to chose between rival models and/or to convince myself that
>> what I'm doing is at all meaningful in this challenging empirical
>> case?
>> (3) ALTERNATIVE EMPIRICAL MODELS? Are there any other empirical
>> specifications that are better suited to fit this data? I tried to
>> search for extremely rare events such as earthquakes, but couldn't
>> get much out of it.
>> (4) PANEL ELEMENT? Possibly a bridge too far, but would there be any
>> option to get the panel element of the data to have a bearing on the
>> empirics.
>>
>> Thanks a lot in advance.
>> markus
>>
>> Markus Eberhardt
>> ESRC Post-doctoral Research Fellow, Centre for the Study of African
>> Economies, Department of Economics, University of Oxford Stipendiary
>> Lecturer, St Catherine's College, Oxford
>>
>> web: http://sites.google.com/site/medevecon/home
>> email: [email protected]
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/sjoh2052
>> mail: Centre for the Study of African Economies, Department of
>> Economics, Manor Rd, Oxford OX1 3UQ, England
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/