Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: More elegant code . . .?
From
Michael Costello <[email protected]>
To
statalist <[email protected]>
Subject
st: More elegant code . . .?
Date
Sat, 4 Jun 2011 19:18:11 -0400
Statalisters,
I have some code that I would like to make more elegant (shorter,
while still fitting on one line):
recode letter_auto_stop 0=1 if letter1==0 & letter2==0 & letter3==0 &
letter4==0 & letter5==0 & letter6==0 & letter7==0 & letter8==0 &
letter9==0 & letter10==0
The line above works, but it's bulky. I'd like to find something
better to use. I tried:
recode letter_auto_stop 0=1 if letter1-letter10==0
but stata treated it as "recode letter_auto_stop 0=1 if letter1==0 &
letter10==0" ignoring letter2 through letter9 entirely.
Thanks for any help you can provide!
-Michael
--
Michael Costello
Mathematics & Statistics Teacher, Bethesda-Chevy Chase High School
Intern, RTI International
"To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no
more than asking him to perform a post-mortem examination: he may be
able to say what the experiment died of." -Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher,
FRS
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/