Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: simulating random numbers from zero inflated negative binomial estimates
From
Ari Samaranayaka <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: simulating random numbers from zero inflated negative binomial estimates
Date
Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:03:58 +1200
Dear Paul
Thank you very much for the great help. Your are the first person to
answer my question. Your answer works, and I understood the logic you
used in your codes. Simulated random variates goes quite closely with
observed data. I interpret this as a reasonable model fit. Great. Thank you.
I expected whenever the ZINB model fit is reasonably good, if we use the
ZINB postestimation predict command to produce predicted numbers, those
predicted numbers also should goes closely with observed data.
For example, if I use the command
predict expec, ir
then distribution of resultant values in "expec" should have similar
distribution to observed data (because we do not specify an "exposure"
in our model). However those 2 distributions quite different. Did I
misinterpret the result from predict command.
Thank you again
Ari
On 3/06/2011 2:56 a.m., E. Paul Wileyto wrote:
I'm not sure whether anyone has answered this yet.
First, read the help on zinb post-estimation commands. There are many
flavors of "predict" listed there. You will need three of them before
you start generating random numbers. The first one you will need is:
predict p1, pr
That will generate a new variable, p1, which will be the predicted
probability of an inflated zero. All the work is done for you.
The second predicted quantity you will need is:
predict lp, xb
That will generate the linear combination of predictor variables
weighted by coefficients for the negative binomial part of the model.
Finally, you will need:
predict alpha, xb eq(#3)
which will generate a variable containing the overdispersion parameter
for the negative binomial. With those three bits, you can get on to
simulating.
Here's my script:
zinb cignums drug week, inf(drug week)
predict p1 , pr
predict p2 , xb
predict lnalpha , xb eq(#3)
gen alph=exp(lnalpha)
gen xg=rgamma(1/alph, alph*p2)
gen pg=rpoisson(xg)
gen zi=runiform()>p1
gen newcigs=zi*pg
zinb newcigs drug week, inf(drug week)
Paul
On 6/1/2011 7:13 PM, Ari Samaranayaka wrote:
Deaf statalist members
Can some one help me with this question with regards to zero-inflated
negative binomial regression (ZINB command) . I need to see how good
the fitted model by comparing model outputs with observations. For
this, I aim to simulate random numbers from fitted model to compare
with observed numbers.
Can some one tell me how to simulate random numbers from the fitted
model please? Is there any post estimation command for this? if not,
is it possible to use estimated regression coefficients?
Thank you
Ari-Sam
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/