Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Antwort: Re: st: Putting Coefficients in the same column with esttab/estout
From
Johannes Geyer <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Antwort: Re: st: Putting Coefficients in the same column with esttab/estout
Date
Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:13:10 +0200
I did not understand that you estimate six models and want to report only
three columns - is that correct?
If so, you have to tell esttab that the coefficients of models x and y
belong to the same column, -order- is
not designed to do that.
Ben Jann provides an example on his webpage that is related in the sense
that it shows how to change
models and regressors in a table using Stata syntax
http://repec.org/bocode/e/estout/advanced.html#advanced907
The problem in your case is much simpler I guess. You have to -ereturn
post- beta and se vectors and
tabulate them, e.g.:
******************************************************
sysuse auto
reg mpg foreign weight, nocons
matrix k = e(b)
reg mpg rep78 trunk, nocons
matrix k = k,e(b)
ereturn post k
eststo clear
esttab
*****************************************************
Johannes
----------------------
Johannes Geyer
Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin)
German Institute for Economic Research
Department of Public Economics
DIW Berlin
Mohrenstraße 58
10117 Berlin
Tel: +49-30-89789-258
[email protected] schrieb am 28/04/2011 17:45:30:
> Yes, what you see is what I get with that, unfortunately.
>
> 2011/4/28 Johannes Geyer <[email protected]>:
> > did you try the option -order-?
> >
> > esttab ... , order(lagvar1 avg5fvar lagvar2 avg5gvar...)
> >
> > Johannes
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------
> > Johannes Geyer
> > Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin)
> > German Institute for Economic Research
> > Department of Public Economics
> > DIW Berlin
> > Mohrenstraße 58
> > 10117 Berlin
> > Tel: +49-30-89789-258
> >
> > [email protected] schrieb am 28/04/2011 16:55:52:
> >
> >> Dear all Stata users,
> >> I have just finished running a lot of estimates that i have saved on
> >> my computer with the command estwrite (after having stored them with
> >> estimates store). Now it comes to make some tables, but with both the
> >> commands esttab and estout I cannot let some coefficients stay in the
> >> same column. I can be more precise with an example. What i get with
> >> either esttab (or even estout) is:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> (1) (2) (3)
> >> (4) (5) (6)
> >>
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> lagpolity1 0.014***
> >> (0.000)
> >> lagpolity2 0.027***
> >> (0.001)
> >> avg5polity1
> >> 0.015***
> >>
> >> (0.001)
> >> avg5polity2
> >> 0.028***
> >>
> >> (0.001)
> >> lagfh1 0.054***
> >> (0.002)
> >> lagfh2 0.123***
> >> (0.002)
> >> avg5fh_opp1
> >> 0.045***
> >>
> >> (0.002)
> >> avg5fh_opp2
> >> 0.114***
> >>
> >> (0.002)
> >> lagchga1 0.112***
> >> (0.007)
> >> lagchga2 0.347***
> >> (0.007)
> >> avg5chga1
> >> 0.116***
> >>
> >> (0.007)
> >> avg5chga2
> >> 0.352***
> >>
> >> (0.008)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> But what I'd like to get is the coefficients of all those that I call
> >> avg5 below the coefficients of the lagged vars. In other words,
> >> something like:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> (1) (2) (3)
> >> (4) (5) (6)
> >>
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> lagpolity1 0.014***
> >> (0.000)
> >> lagpolity2 0.027***
> >> (0.001)
> >> avg5polity1 0.015***
> >> (0.001)
> >> avg5polity2 0.028***
> >> (0.001)
> >> lagfh1 0.054***
> >> (0.002)
> >> lagfh2 0.123***
> >> (0.002)
> >> avg5fh_opp1 0.045***
> >> (0.002)
> >> avg5fh_opp2 0.114***
> >> (0.002)
> >> lagchga1 0.112***
> >> (0.007)
> >> lagchga2 0.347***
> >> (0.007)
> >> avg5chga1 0.116***
> >> (0.007)
> >> avg5chga2 0.352***
> >> (0.008)
> >>
> >>
> >> But obviously I do not want to run all the regressions again (it'd
> >> take ages!!).
> >>
> >> Anyone can help me?
> >>
> >> Thanks to all of you for your time and consideration,
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Emanuele.
> >> *
> >> * For searches and help try:
> >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> >> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >
> >
> > *
> > * For searches and help try:
> > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/