Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Putting Coefficients in the same column with esttab/estout
From
emanuele mazzini <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Putting Coefficients in the same column with esttab/estout
Date
Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:45:30 +0200
Yes, what you see is what I get with that, unfortunately.
2011/4/28 Johannes Geyer <[email protected]>:
> did you try the option -order-?
>
> esttab ... , order(lagvar1 avg5fvar lagvar2 avg5gvar...)
>
> Johannes
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------
> Johannes Geyer
> Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin)
> German Institute for Economic Research
> Department of Public Economics
> DIW Berlin
> Mohrenstraße 58
> 10117 Berlin
> Tel: +49-30-89789-258
>
> [email protected] schrieb am 28/04/2011 16:55:52:
>
>> Dear all Stata users,
>> I have just finished running a lot of estimates that i have saved on
>> my computer with the command estwrite (after having stored them with
>> estimates store). Now it comes to make some tables, but with both the
>> commands esttab and estout I cannot let some coefficients stay in the
>> same column. I can be more precise with an example. What i get with
>> either esttab (or even estout) is:
>>
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> (1) (2) (3)
>> (4) (5) (6)
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> lagpolity1 0.014***
>> (0.000)
>> lagpolity2 0.027***
>> (0.001)
>> avg5polity1
>> 0.015***
>>
>> (0.001)
>> avg5polity2
>> 0.028***
>>
>> (0.001)
>> lagfh1 0.054***
>> (0.002)
>> lagfh2 0.123***
>> (0.002)
>> avg5fh_opp1
>> 0.045***
>>
>> (0.002)
>> avg5fh_opp2
>> 0.114***
>>
>> (0.002)
>> lagchga1 0.112***
>> (0.007)
>> lagchga2 0.347***
>> (0.007)
>> avg5chga1
>> 0.116***
>>
>> (0.007)
>> avg5chga2
>> 0.352***
>>
>> (0.008)
>>
>>
>>
>> But what I'd like to get is the coefficients of all those that I call
>> avg5 below the coefficients of the lagged vars. In other words,
>> something like:
>>
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> (1) (2) (3)
>> (4) (5) (6)
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> lagpolity1 0.014***
>> (0.000)
>> lagpolity2 0.027***
>> (0.001)
>> avg5polity1 0.015***
>> (0.001)
>> avg5polity2 0.028***
>> (0.001)
>> lagfh1 0.054***
>> (0.002)
>> lagfh2 0.123***
>> (0.002)
>> avg5fh_opp1 0.045***
>> (0.002)
>> avg5fh_opp2 0.114***
>> (0.002)
>> lagchga1 0.112***
>> (0.007)
>> lagchga2 0.347***
>> (0.007)
>> avg5chga1 0.116***
>> (0.007)
>> avg5chga2 0.352***
>> (0.008)
>>
>>
>> But obviously I do not want to run all the regressions again (it'd
>> take ages!!).
>>
>> Anyone can help me?
>>
>> Thanks to all of you for your time and consideration,
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Emanuele.
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/