Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: st: sts graph: different results with -atrisk- vs -risktable- option
From
Charles Lindsey <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: Re: st: sts graph: different results with -atrisk- vs -risktable- option
Date
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:31:21 -0500
Alex Gamma <[email protected]> separately used the -atrisk- and
-risktable- options in two -sts graph- calls with data that contained
multiple records per subject. There was a large discrepancy in the
results from the two calls. The graphed -atrisk- numbers were
significantly larger than the -risktable- numbers. Alex compared with
-sts list- as well, and found these numbers matched the -risktable-
numbers. Some of the -atrisk- numbers actually exceeded the total
number of subjects in Alex's dataset.
Joerg Luedicke <[email protected]> investigated the issue with
-atrisk- and -risktable- that Alex discovered. He also found that some
of the -atrisk- numbers exceeded the total number of subjects in the
data.
This is a bug in -sts graph, atrisk- that can arise in multiple record
survival data. We are investigating and will provide a solution in a
future ado update.
--Charles Lindsey
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/