Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: levpredict after areg
From
"Dimitriy V. Masterov" <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: levpredict after areg
Date
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:22:26 -0400
My apologies for forgetting to mention the origins of levpredict.
Consider this silly model:
/*************************************************/
sysuse auto, clear
foreach var of varlist price weight length {
gen l`var'=ln(`var')
}
areg lprice lweight llength, absorb(rep78)
set trace on
levpredict pricehat1
set trace off
reg lprice lweight llength i.rep78
levpredict pricehat2
compare pricehat*
/*************************************************/
-areg- estimates a model where y = xb + d_absorbvar + e. I would like
to include both the effect of weight and length as well as the
relevant dummy for repair record in my prediction. From my
interpretation of the trace output, levpredict is only calculating the
xb part.
Unfortunately, I can't seem to get the second option to work in a
reasonable amount of time. areg takes about 5 minutes to run with my
data, while reg has been at it for most of the afternoon.
DVM
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> -levpredict- is from SSC. Please remember...
>
> I don't know why intuition is invoked here. You can look at the code,
> and it's a short but sweet program. -levpredict- is indifferent to
> quite what lies beyond the fitted and residual values.
>
> In any case, what do you mean by "including the effect of the absorbed
> variable"?
>
> Nick
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Dimitriy V. Masterov
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I am estimating a model using -areg- where the dependent variable is
>> logged. I was hoping to use -levpredict- to transform my prediction
>> back to levels and I would like include the effect of the absorbed
>> variable. My intuition is that levpredict is just using the xb fitted
>> values and omitting d_absorbvar. Is there a way to do this?
>>
>> I tried to estimate the model using reg with a large set of factor
>> variable created dummies, but this seems a whole lot slower than areg.
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/