Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: different results of estat vif in different versions
From
"Michael N. Mitchell" <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: different results of estat vif in different versions
Date
Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:47:51 -0800
Greetings
Can you try and post the results again showing the Stata 10 and Stata 11 results
(showing both the results of the "regress" command and the "estat vif" commands? Hopefully
the output will not wrap as it did before.
Thanks,
Michael N. Mitchell
Data Management Using Stata - http://www.stata.com/bookstore/dmus.html
A Visual Guide to Stata Graphics - http://www.stata.com/bookstore/vgsg.html
Stata tidbit of the week - http://www.MichaelNormanMitchell.com
On 2011-03-02 5.14 PM, Yang Jue wrote:
Thank you very much for your mail.
Here is my command. I used the cluster option.
regress unfccc logpopsize logimfgdppc growthrateinterpolate freedom engonumber iengobranch proportion ruralpopulation forestarea eumember Industryinterpolate igonumber wtreatynorwmlag wlanlag wrellag wgnipclag wdistance year1994 year1995 year1996 year1997 year1998 year1999 year2000 year2004 if _st==1, cluster(id)
estat vif
My coauthor and I use the same dataset and same do.file in our different PC.Then it comes out that only the vif value are different.
Best Regards,Jue YangCenter for Global Enviornmental ResearchNational Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan
----------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 10:32:31 -0800
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: different results of estat vif in different versions
I concur with Richard on both counts. The output got wrapped and garbled, but even so it
looks like the models are not the same in the Stata 10 and Stata 11 models.
Best regards,
Michael N. Mitchell
Data Management Using Stata - http://www.stata.com/bookstore/dmus.html
A Visual Guide to Stata Graphics - http://www.stata.com/bookstore/vgsg.html
Stata tidbit of the week - http://www.MichaelNormanMitchell.com
On 2011-03-02 6.15 AM, Richard Williams wrote:
At 03:14 AM 3/2/2011, Yang Jue wrote:
Thank you very much for your mail. Here are my results.
Unfortunately, the output is extremely hard to read, at least on my machine. Are you sure
the models are identical? At a minimum, the variables seem to be getting listed in a
different order, which makes me wonder if the commands are actually the same.
It appears you are using the cluster option on the -regress- command, and Michael was not,
so maybe that has something to do with the discrepancies.
Showing the actual code might be helpful.
-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/