Re: st: different results of estat vif in different versions

["Michael N. Mitchell" <Michael.Norman.Mitchell@gmail.com>]

I concur with Richard on both counts. The output got wrapped and garbled, but even so it 
looks like the models are not the same in the Stata 10 and Stata 11 models.

Best regards,

Michael N. Mitchell
Data Management Using Stata      - http://www.stata.com/bookstore/dmus.html
A Visual Guide to Stata Graphics - http://www.stata.com/bookstore/vgsg.html
Stata tidbit of the week         - http://www.MichaelNormanMitchell.com



On 2011-03-02 6.15 AM, Richard Williams wrote:
> At 03:14 AM 3/2/2011, Yang Jue wrote:
>
> > Thank you very much for your mail. Here are my results.
>
> Unfortunately, the output is extremely hard to read, at least on my machine. Are you sure
> the models are identical? At a minimum, the variables seem to be getting listed in a
> different order, which makes me wonder if the commands are actually the same.
>
> It appears you are using the cluster option on the -regress- command, and Michael was not,
> so maybe that has something to do with the discrepancies.
>
> Showing the actual code might be helpful.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
> OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
> HOME: (574)289-5227
> EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu
> WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/