Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Michael N. Mitchell" <Michael.Norman.Mitchell@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: different results of estat vif in different versions |
Date | Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:32:31 -0800 |
Best regards, Michael N. Mitchell Data Management Using Stata - http://www.stata.com/bookstore/dmus.html A Visual Guide to Stata Graphics - http://www.stata.com/bookstore/vgsg.html Stata tidbit of the week - http://www.MichaelNormanMitchell.com On 2011-03-02 6.15 AM, Richard Williams wrote:
At 03:14 AM 3/2/2011, Yang Jue wrote:Thank you very much for your mail. Here are my results.Unfortunately, the output is extremely hard to read, at least on my machine. Are you sure the models are identical? At a minimum, the variables seem to be getting listed in a different order, which makes me wonder if the commands are actually the same. It appears you are using the cluster option on the -regress- command, and Michael was not, so maybe that has something to do with the discrepancies. Showing the actual code might be helpful. ------------------------------------------- Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463 HOME: (574)289-5227 EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/