Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: IV Command and Reported Results Problem
From
Sinan Hastorun <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: IV Command and Reported Results Problem
Date
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:06:54 -0500
Thank you Nick. I just included that note in my question in order to inquire about whether the command may be part of the problem here. Do you have a take on why I am not getting any actual numerical results reported for Wald chi2(53), Prob > chi2, R-squared?
Sinan
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 11:59 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: st: IV Command and Reported Results Problem
Short answer is No; no such simplistic statement deserves assent.
Enormously longer answers from the experts....
Nick
[email protected]
Sinan Hastorun
I am running IV in STATA by using the command ivregress because it is said to perform better than ivreg or ivreg2. Is that correct?
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/