Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | Sinan Hastorun <SinanH@remi.com> |
| To | "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
| Subject | st: RE: IV Command and Reported Results Problem |
| Date | Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:06:54 -0500 |
Thank you Nick. I just included that note in my question in order to inquire about whether the command may be part of the problem here. Do you have a take on why I am not getting any actual numerical results reported for Wald chi2(53), Prob > chi2, R-squared? Sinan -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Nick Cox Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 11:59 AM To: 'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu' Subject: st: IV Command and Reported Results Problem Short answer is No; no such simplistic statement deserves assent. Enormously longer answers from the experts.... Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Sinan Hastorun I am running IV in STATA by using the command ivregress because it is said to perform better than ivreg or ivreg2. Is that correct? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/