Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Poisson Regression |
Date | Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:50:21 +0000 (GMT) |
--- On Mon, 14/2/11, Alexandra Boing wrote: > I dont understand,"curve still look resonable" Remember that -poisson- for a binary variable is a model that cannot be true. Under certain circumstances it can still be useful. You need to explore the consequences of your model on your data to see if you are just pushing your model/data too hard or if it is still reasonable. This requires that you know what would be reasonable outcomes for your research topic, but you should have ideas on that anyhow. To be concrete just execute the example as I sent it <http://www.maartenbuis.nl/example_faq/index.html#work> and than just look at the graph. If that looks reasonable to you then it looks reasonable. It is as simple as that. There is no magic involved in these types of model checking, it is just knowledge on the process being studied that is being compared with the outcomes of your model. > and "curve from a -logit- regression, which would > be the obvious alternative when -poisson- leads > to unrealistic predictions". Again, execute the example as I sent it. You will see two curves: one from -poisson- and one from -logit-. The curves created by -logit- will always remain within the [0, 1] range, and are for that reason the logical alternative. If you choose -logit- than you will than need to give up on interpreting the results as risk ratios and instead move to odds ratios. Hope this helps, Maarten -------------------------- Maarten L. Buis Institut fuer Soziologie Universitaet Tuebingen Wilhelmstrasse 36 72074 Tuebingen Germany http://www.maartenbuis.nl -------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/