Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Binary Choice Panel Data Model with Sample Selection.
From
Ippab <[email protected]>
To
[email protected], Stata Technical Support <[email protected]>
Subject
st: Binary Choice Panel Data Model with Sample Selection.
Date
Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:23:43 -0700
Hello Stata Users,
I have a panel data with censored observations (sample selection),
where the outcome variable is binary. Therefore, I need to estimate
both the selection equation and outcome equation with binary choice
models. I am wondering if there is any command (user written or stata
provided) for estimating such a heckman model with panel data (I am
interested in both fixed and random effects).
I have tried to use the heckprob command, but it does not converge.
Also, my understanding is that it does not consider the panel nature
of the data. I was able to find a reasonable instrument for the
selection equation, but it still did not work.
Is it reasonable to do the estimation along the line of two step
heckit approach? In particular, if I get the mills ratio from a
probit model in the first step and include that as a control variable
in the xtlogit or xtprobit with the censored data, would it be
correct? I followed this approach and the mills ratio is significant.
From reading the relevant literature, even if this is correct, I need
to correct the standard error in implementing the two step method.
How do I correct the standard errors after running xtlogit or
xtprobit? Finally, how do I calculate the conditional marginal
effect?
I would really appreciate any ideas, suggestions, or directions you
may have. Thanks a lot in advance!
Best regards,
ippab
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/