Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: epiconf: counfounding
From
SR Millis <[email protected]>
To
Stata <[email protected]>
Subject
st: epiconf: counfounding
Date
Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:43:13 -0800 (PST)
I've been working with your Stata program, epiconf. Using theaccompanying dataset and fitting the following logistic regression model:
. epiconf dead ab_uria, con(age weight) cat(hichol hypert smoke sex) backward
I obtained the following results. How do you interpret the model when the changes in the absolute values of the change in the odds ratios are not monotonically increasing (in the case of backward selection) or, in the case of forward selection, monotonically decreasing? That is, in this model, if we take 10% as the cut-point of importance, we need only adjust for age, smoking, and weight? If so, how do you obtain the adjusted rate ratio and its confidence interval?
Assessment of Confounding Effects Using Change-in-Estimate Method
Outcome: "dead"
Exposure: "ab_uria"
N = 743
Backward approach
Potential confounders were removed one at a time sequentially
Adj Var 95% CI Change in OR p
Crude 2.35 1.24, 4.44 . .
-i.sex 2.26 1.21, 4.24 -3.6 0.47664
-i.hichol 2.08 1.12, 3.86 -8.0 0.15144
-weight 1.88 1.04, 3.40 -10.0 0.21915
-i.hypert 2.00 1.13, 3.55 6.6 0.42812
-i.smoke 2.24 1.28, 3.92 11.9 0.06456
-age* 3.90 2.34, 6.52 74.4 0.00000
*Crude estimate
Thank you in advance for your help.
SR Millis
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/