Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: System GMM line
From
Francesco Grigoli <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: System GMM line
Date
Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:09:30 -0500
Dear all,
I am experiencing a problem with the System GMM estimation.
If I run a cross correlation analysis I get that income per capita in
PPP terms and public investment as a percentage of GDP are negatively
correlated:
| ln_gdppc public~o
-------------+------------------
ln_gdppc | 1.0000
public_inv~o| -0.1646 1.0000
If I run a fixed effects panel regression, I get a negative
coefficient on the income per capita variable. However, if I run a
sytem GMM, which should take care of the endogeneity between income
and public investment, i get a positive and significant coefficient on
the income variable. I don't expect it to be significantly negative,
but the positive sign is very weird, given also that with other
methodologies it is negative (and significant).
Here is the line I used:
xi: xtabond2 public_investment_ratio l.public_investment_ratio
quality_of_governance ln_cia_land_area ln_wdi_pop left_party_largest
penn_pi ln_gdppc i.year, gmm(public_investment_ratio penn_pi ln_gdppc,
lag(1 5) collapse) iv(quality_of_governance ln_cia_land_area
ln_wdi_pop left_party_largest i.year) robust
Whichever lag structure I use, I get the positive and significant
coefficient. Am I doing something wrong with the code for the system
GMM?
Best,
Francesco
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/