Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: FW: Marginal effects for the two-part model
From
Maarten buis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
RE: st: FW: Marginal effects for the two-part model
Date
Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:18:43 +0000 (GMT)
--- On Wed, 2/2/11, Maarten buis wrote:
> The difference between that and your two-part model is
> that in that model the dependence is included by deriving
> the inverse Mill's ratio from the selection model, add it
> to the OLS model, and adjust the standard errors.
Nick is in a pedantic mood today(*). He correctly pointed
out to me privately that it is Mills' ratio and not Mill's
ratio. (And the moment he told me, I remembered that he
made that point before, and at that time I made a mental note
not to make that mistake...
<http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2008-02/msg00945.html>)
-- Maarten
(*) but see the entry on pedantry in this glossary:
<http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-01/msg00003.html>
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/