Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Regressions with combinatorial of variables |
Date | Tue, 1 Feb 2011 19:13:46 +0000 |
I suggest that before trying to program this yourself, check out -stepwise-, the Lindsey and Sheather paper in SJ 10(4) 2010 and above all the discussion of stepwise in Frank Harrell's Regression modeling strategies (Springer, New York, 2001). I note that you have 2^131 ~ 3 * 10^39 possible models. (Well, one fewer.) Nick 2011/2/1 José Luis Chávez Calva <josechc@gmail.com>: > I have to run different regressions with combinations of variables (I > have 131 vars), the problem is the following > > I have to run: > reg var1 > case 1) var1 is significant, then > reg var1 var2 > case 2) car1 is not significant, then > reg var2 > In both cases, if var2 is significant, then > case 1) reg var1 var2 var3 > case 2) reg var2 var3 > In both cases, if var2 is not significant, then > case 1) reg var1 var3 > case 2) reg var3 > .... > And so on, in fact it is a kind of tree, I have tried different > especifications (forvalues, locals, if,etc.) but I didn´t have > results, I'm wondering if some of you have worked with something like > this. > > p.s. It is for obtain a smoother of the serie. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/