Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: predict y | y not observed after heckman
From
Florian Wakolbinger <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: predict y | y not observed after heckman
Date
Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:38:55 +0100
thanks for the reply,
I found "predict, ycond", which produces the prediction conditional on y
being observed. However, there seems to be no command for a prediction
conditional on y being NOT observed.
Is it necessary to calculate this "by hand", or is there an alternative
command that does this?
br,
Florian
--
Dr. Florian Wakolbinger
Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter
Gesellschaft für Angewandte
Wirtschaftsforschung mbH
Amraserstrasse 15
6020 Innsbruck
www.gaw-mbh.at
0043 664 638 5993
Am 01.02.2011 09:43, schrieb Maarten buis:
--- On Tue, 1/2/11, Florian Wakolbinger wrote:
I want to predict a y-variable in a heckman selection model
conditional on y not being observed. Do you know about a
stata-command that does this?
Type in Stata -help heckman postestimation- and look at the
section on -predict-.
Hope this helps,
Maarten
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/