Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: micombine versus mim
From
Anders Alexandersson <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: micombine versus mim
Date
Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:28:50 -0500
Elisabetta, use the more comprehensive -mim-, not -micombine-, as
stated in SJ 9:3 on page 466.
Both are user-written commands. The article is available here:
http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0067_4
For more assistance, please provide an example that is easy to replicate.
Anders Alexandersson
[email protected]
On Sat, Jan 22, Elisabetta Petracci <[email protected]> wrote:
> anybody can tell why when I obtain different estimates when using
> command "micombine" compared to "mim" using STATA 11?
> I downloaded "mim" last version by Royston.
> I have imputed missing values doing 15 replications and to performe,
> in the end, a quantile regression.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/