Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
re:st:Bundell and Blond: Sargan Test
From
Christopher Baum <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
re:st:Bundell and Blond: Sargan Test
Date
Wed, 5 Jan 2011 10:55:00 -0500
<>
I have a panel data model of international trade, and im regressing the
quantity of imports, for a set of products, using as regressors numbers of
importers, number of exportes, trend, etc.
I´ve estimated the model using POLS, Fixed Effects and GMM (Arellano Bond
and Bundell Blond). The problem that I found is that ar(1) and ar(2) test
perform well, but I reject always the Sargan Test.
What did you recommend? Forget GMM and use Fixed Effects?
The Sargan test is not robustified, as it assumes iid errors. You should consult the Hansen J test statistic available, for instance, from Roodman's xtabond2 (on SSC).
BTW the authors of SYS-GMM are Richard Blundell and Steve Bond.
Kit
Kit Baum | Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin | http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
An Introduction to Stata Programming | http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata | http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/