Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: is there apc_ie predict post-estimation?
From
Wincent <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: is there apc_ie predict post-estimation?
Date
Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:55:34 +0800
May I ask how to use the three options. It generates an error like this,
. use "apc_example_data.dta", clear
. apc_ie death_f if age<=90, age(age) period(year) cohort(cohort)
family(poisson) link(log) exposure(exp_f) agefx(A) cohortfx(C)
periodfx(P)
option agefx() not allowed
r(198);
Regards,
Ronggui
On 1 August 2010 20:24, Steve Samuels <[email protected]> wrote:
> The -help- for -apc_ie- indicates that it takes -glm- options, and
> inspection of the source code reveals that it indeed calls -glm-. So
> all -glm- post-estimation command should work. The answer to your
> question is "yes", provided you use the agefx(), periodfx() and
> cohortfx() options (not mentioned in the -help-) and keep the
> generated variables. Run the second example in the accompanying do
> file (net describe apc, from(http://fmwww.bc.edu/RePEc/bocode/a) and
> do _not_ drop the generated variables _A* _P* and _C*. Then -predict-
> should work as expected.
>
> Steve
>
> --
> Steven Samuels
> [email protected]
> 18 Cantine's Island
> Saugerties NY 12477
> USA
> Voice: 845-246-0774
> Fax: 206-202-4783
--
Wincent Ronggui HUANG (Ph.D.)
City University of Hong Kong
http://asrr.r-forge.r-project.org/rghuang.html
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/