Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: question about endogeneity test after 2SLS
From
Deepankar Basu <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: question about endogeneity test after 2SLS
Date
Sun, 03 Oct 2010 22:59:50 -0400
Hi Statalist,
I am using STATA 11.1 on Windows 7. I estimated a model using "ivregress":
. ivregress 2sls D.lemp L.D.lrgva L.L.D.lrgva (D.lrgva = L.D.lrpcg
L.D.lrfinv L.D.lrgva L.D.rgexp L.L.D.lrgva) if tin(2001q1,2007q4),
vce(hac nwest)
After the estimation, I do the following specification test:
. estat endogenous
Tests of endogeneity
Ho: variables are exogenous
HAC score chi2(1) = .253277 (p = 0.6148)
(Prewhitening performed with 1 lag)
HAC regression F(1,12) = 3.21364 (p = 0.0983)
(Based on Bartlett kernel with 15 lags)
The HAC score test indicates that the the null cannot be rejected
(p-value is 0.6148); on the other hand, the regression-based test
indicates that the null hypothesis can be rejected at the 10 percent
level (p-value is 0.0983). Thus, the two tests give conflicting
results regarding the endogeneity of the regressor (D.lrgva). What is
the best practice in such situations of conflicting result?
Thanks in advance.
Deepankar Basu
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/