Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: re: comparison two SUR models
From
Christopher Baum <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: re: comparison two SUR models
Date
Sun, 3 Oct 2010 21:29:42 -0400
<>
I'm using seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) technique to estimate
four models (equations). I have imposed symmetry in this model (some
coefficients amog different equations are the same). I have also run
the same 4 equations under the same approach without imposing
symmetry. I want to compare both models to see which one is more
appropriate.
Instead of imposing the constraints and estimating the SUR system with symmetry, estimate the unrestricted system
and use -test- to jointly specify all of the symmetry restrictions. That will give you an F test (with numerator df equal to the number of restrictions) that will allow you to consider the null of symmetry.
There is a worked example of this in section 9.4 of IMEUS.
Kit
Kit Baum | Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin | http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
An Introduction to Stata Programming | http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata | http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/