Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: marginal effects after heckman (Stata11)
From
Maarten buis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
RE: st: marginal effects after heckman (Stata11)
Date
Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:44:38 +0000 (GMT)
--- On Thu, 16/9/10, Stephani Jens wrote:
> Well even with -version control-, mfx
> is very much slower in Stata11 than it was in Stata10;
> takes about 3 hours instead of 20 minutes (when I am trying
> to replicate some old analysis I made in Stata10).
-version- is not a time machine, so I am not surprised that
that will not have a big effect. With this type of problem it
often helps to rescale the variables so that the sizes of the
parameters are roughly similar. Having said that, -margins-
is the new command for marginal effects, so in the long run
it is probably a good idea to learn that command.
Hope this helps,
Maarten
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/