Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: marginal effects after heckman (Stata11)
From
"Stephani Jens" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: marginal effects after heckman (Stata11)
Date
Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:50:18 +0200
Well even with -version control-, mfx is very much slower in Stata11 than it was in Stata10;
takes about 3 hours instead of 20 minutes (when I am trying to replicate some old analysis I made in Stata10).
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Maarten buis
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: marginal effects after heckman (Stata11)
--- On Thu, 16/9/10, Stephani Jens wrote:
> after estimating a heckman selection model in Stata11 I
> need to compute the conditional and
> unconditional marginal effects. In Stata10 this is done by
> using the mfx-command.
> As the mfx is not working properly in Stata11, does anyone
> know how this is done in Stata11 by
> using the new margins-command?
What makes you think that -mfx- is no longer working? -mfx-
is superseded by -margins, but it should still work as
before.
-- Maarten
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/