Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Clive Nicholas <clivelists@googlemail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Nominal or ordinal? |
Date | Fri, 13 Aug 2010 03:50:29 +0100 |
Richard Williams replied: > I didn't realize that -mlogtest- was originally an STB program. I don't > know if it has changed much over the years, but the most current version is > contained in -spost9-, available on Scott Long's web site. ( -findit spost9- > ). The spost9 suite has a lot of other useful programs, including -brant-, > which tests whether the assumptions of the ordered logit model are violated. I was going to mention -spost9-, but nothing comes up either for -h spost9- or -h mlogtest-, so I chose to cite the earlier reference for the sake of some clarity over none. Good catch regarding -brant-: I'd forgotten about that, but that test does come with health warnings. But then, they all do. -- Clive Nicholas [Please DO NOT mail me personally here, but at <clivenicholas@hotmail.com>. Please respond to contributions I make in a list thread here. Thanks!] "My colleagues in the social sciences talk a great deal about methodology. I prefer to call it style." -- Freeman J. Dyson. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/