Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Nominal or ordinal?
From
Clive Nicholas <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Nominal or ordinal?
Date
Fri, 13 Aug 2010 01:38:50 +0100
Chelsea B Polis wrote:
> I am working with a dependent variable that has the following four potential responses: (1) Not Likely, (2) Slightly Likely, (3) Quite Likely, (4) Extremely Likely.
>
> A colleague thinks this is an ordinal variable which should be analyzed using ordered
> logit regression. My sense was that this is a nominal variable, and should be analyzed > using multinomial regression - since we cannot know if the levels are
> equally spaced in people's minds.
In addition to the excellent responses given, with which I concur, you
could treat the variable as multinomial, regress it onto your
independent variables by fitting -mlogit-, and then test the IIA
assumption with the user-written -mlogtest- (downloadable via STB:
-net stb 58 sg155-). If the IIA is violated, then you might consider
combining a couple of the indicators of your response variable before
running it through -ologit- or -oprobit-. Then again, you might think
of all this as rather too exotic.
--
Clive Nicholas
[Please DO NOT mail me personally here, but at
<[email protected]>. Please respond to contributions I make in
a list thread here. Thanks!]
"My colleagues in the social sciences talk a great deal about
methodology. I prefer to call it style." -- Freeman J. Dyson.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/