Re: st: RE: RE: eivreg and deming

[John Antonakis <john.antonakis@unil.ch>]

Hi Nick:

One example where eivreg is perfectly legitimate to use: IQ is mostly 
exogenous (determined by genes); so, if we have a non-so-perfect proxy 
of IQ, we can estimate it's reliability (empirically via test-retest or 
via internal consistency) and thus "purge" the endogeneity bias due to 
measurement error. This is much easier to do and more defensible than 
trying to instrument IQ.  I would be hard pressed to find a good 
instrument for IQ.
Best,
J.

____________________________________________________

Prof. John Antonakis, Associate Dean 
Faculty of Business and Economics
Department of Organizational Behavior
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland

Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305

Faculty page:
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis

Personal page:
http://www.hec.unil.ch/jantonakis
____________________________________________________



On 01.06.2010 19:43, Nick Cox wrote:
> Compared with what? is a flip but nevertheless I suggest also a fair
> answer. 
>
> I can't comment on Tony's specifics here -- as there aren't any! -- but
> I guess that many people feel queasy in this territory because deciding
> on a proper treatment of situations in which all variables are subject
> to error is very demanding. There are so many things to be specified
> about error structure. 
>
> StataCorp's own feelings appear mixed too: there is a bundle of good
> stuff at http://www.stata.com/merror that is semi-official (my
> description not theirs!). 
>
> By the way, many economists and econometricians seem fixated on using
> instrumental variables in this situation, but such methods don't exhaust
> the possibilities. 
>
> Nick 
> n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 
>
> Lachenbruch, Peter
>
> At a seminar not long ago, an eminent statistician commented that EIV
> was not very useful and led to more problems (he didn't specify what
> they were) that it was worth.  Anyone else have similar experience?
>
> Risto.Herrala@bof.fi
>
> I need to do errors in variables regression, where the errors are
> heteroscedastic. A Stata user has programmed a 'deming' ado -file for
> this purpose. Does anyone have experience of its use?
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>   
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/