Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | "Lachenbruch, Peter" <Peter.Lachenbruch@oregonstate.edu> |
| To | "'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
| Subject | st: RE: eivreg and deming |
| Date | Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:11:00 -0700 |
At a seminar not long ago, an eminent statistician commented that EIV was not very useful and led to more problems (he didn't specify what they were) that it was worth. Anyone else have similar experience? Tony Peter A. Lachenbruch Department of Public Health Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97330 Phone: 541-737-3832 FAX: 541-737-4001 -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Risto.Herrala@bof.fi Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:12 AM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: eivreg and deming Hi I's need to do errors in variables regression, where the errors are heteroscedastic. A Stata user has programmed a 'deming' ado -file for this purpose. Does anyone have experience of its use? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/