Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: eivreg and deming
From
"Lachenbruch, Peter" <[email protected]>
To
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: eivreg and deming
Date
Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:11:00 -0700
At a seminar not long ago, an eminent statistician commented that EIV was not very useful and led to more problems (he didn't specify what they were) that it was worth. Anyone else have similar experience?
Tony
Peter A. Lachenbruch
Department of Public Health
Oregon State University
Corvallis, OR 97330
Phone: 541-737-3832
FAX: 541-737-4001
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: eivreg and deming
Hi
I's need to do errors in variables regression, where the errors are heteroscedastic. A Stata user has programmed a 'deming' ado -file for this purpose. Does anyone have experience of its use?
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/