Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Richard Williams <richardwilliams.ndu@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Understanding Factor variables - is order significant ? |
Date | Tue, 25 May 2010 22:43:14 -0500 |
At 09:19 PM 5/25/2010, Michael N. Mitchell wrote:
Dear Richard I think I need to use my glasses!Yes, Richard, you are exactly on target. It relates to the use of -#- instead of -##- .My previous answer is still true, in the sense that when you do a#b and b#a, that you get a different reference "cell", and thus it is re-scrambling the coding.
I agree with everything you say. But, it still isn't clear to me why it should make a difference whether you use b1.ra#b0.dm versus b0.dm#b1.ra. Tweaking your example, the following yield identical or equivalent results for regress but not for poisson:
sysuse auto, clear generate bigtrunk = trunk > 15 generate biglen = length > 190 regress mpg bigtrunk#biglen regress mpg b1.bigtrunk#b0.biglen regress mpg b0.biglen#b1.bigtrunk poisson mpg bigtrunk#biglen, nolog poisson mpg b1.bigtrunk#b0.biglen, nolog poisson mpg b0.biglen#b1.bigtrunk, nologUse of ## in the last 2 commands avoids the problem, but why is there a problem in the first place?
------------------------------------------- Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463 HOME: (574)289-5227 EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/