Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Understanding Factor variables - is order significant ?
From
"Jesper Lindhardsen" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: Understanding Factor variables - is order significant ?
Date
Wed, 26 May 2010 00:22:27 +0200
Dear Statalisters,
I am having a hard time understanding why 2 regression models that
differ only by the "order" of the included factor variables yield
different results???
I can't (or am too slow to) find the answer in the documentation, but I
think it is related to the parsing of the baselevel specifiers (see
model 1 legend = _b[0o.ra#0b.dm] ???).
Here are the 2 commands and resulting output - as you can see I've only
changed b1.ra#b0.dm to b0.dm#b1.ra. Output has been edited, but only
left out if identical between models.
(System: Stata 11/MP for windows, born 10 feb 2010)
1)
poisson _d b1.ra#b0.dm i.alder_k sex if ex==0, e(risk_tid) irr
coeflegend
_d IRR Legend
ra#dm
0 0 1.487748 _b[0o.ra#0b.dm]
0 1 1.968017 _b[0.ra#1.dm]
1 1 2.787839 _b[1b.ra#1.dm]
alder_k
1 6.176815 _b[1.alder_k]
2 18.09798 _b[2.alder_k]
sex 2.070646 _b[sex]
risk_tid (exposure)
2)
poisson _d b0.dm#b1.ra i.alder_k sex if ex==0, e(risk_tid) irr
coeflegend
_d IRR Legend
dm#ra
0 0 .5935912 _b[0b.dm#0.ra]
1 0 1.169963 _b[1.dm#0.ra]
1 1 1.65762 _b[1.dm#1b.ra]
alder_k
1 6.171095 _b[1.alder_k]
2 18.07456 _b[2.alder_k]
sex 2.072329 _b[sex]
risk_tid (exposure)
Hope its not too elementary.....
Thanks you all for your contributions to statalist, it's a really
valuable source of information for me.
Regards,
Jesper Lindhardsen
MD, Ph.d. student
Department of Cardiovascular Research
Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte
Denmark
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/