Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | Steve Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com> |
| To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
| Subject | Re: st: Discrete time hazard model - Interval width |
| Date | Sun, 23 May 2010 23:12:24 -0400 |
The phrase "person-wave intervals" doesn't convey anything to me; I would not use it. Another issue: the estimated probabilities of first stable jobs will be biased downwards if there are participants who got a first "stable" job after one study interview and lost the job prior to the next interview. You could study the extent of the bias with a sensitivity analysis Steve On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 5:17 AM, <gideluca@unical.it> wrote: > Dear Stephen and Steve, > with intrinsecally discrete time data we have identical set of intervals for > all persons (individuals might be failed in different point times but we do > not know this piece of information). It sounds that we have to be careful > and refer to "person-wave" intervals when we discuss the results from the > analysis after applying pgmhaz8. > Thank you very much. > Giuliana. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > -- Steven Samuels sjsamuels@gmail.com 18 Cantine's Island Saugerties NY 12477 USA Voice: 845-246-0774 Fax: 206-202-4783 * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/