Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Discrete time hazard model - Interval width
From
Steve Samuels <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Discrete time hazard model - Interval width
Date
Sun, 23 May 2010 23:12:24 -0400
The phrase "person-wave intervals" doesn't convey anything to me; I
would not use it. Another issue: the estimated probabilities of
first stable jobs will be biased downwards if there are participants
who got a first "stable" job after one study interview and lost the
job prior to the next interview. You could study the extent of the
bias with a sensitivity analysis
Steve
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 5:17 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Stephen and Steve,
> with intrinsecally discrete time data we have identical set of intervals for
> all persons (individuals might be failed in different point times but we do
> not know this piece of information). It sounds that we have to be careful
> and refer to "person-wave" intervals when we discuss the results from the
> analysis after applying pgmhaz8.
> Thank you very much.
> Giuliana.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
--
Steven Samuels
[email protected]
18 Cantine's Island
Saugerties NY 12477
USA
Voice: 845-246-0774
Fax: 206-202-4783
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/